Finance MINI Paceman - mini paceman 2013 2016 front angleFinance MINI Paceman - mini paceman 2013 2016 rear angleFinance MINI Paceman - mini paceman 2013 2016 full side profile
3.5 out of 5

MINI Paceman (2013 - 2016) Review

Expert review with performance specs, running costs, and finance options.

Volkswagen Golf Hatchback

Market Position:

The Golf is positioned as a premium compact hatchback, known for its quality, practicality, and strong resale value.

Features Comparison:

The Golf offers a more spacious interior and a larger boot compared to the Paceman. It is praised for its refined driving dynamics and high-quality cabin materials, while also featuring advanced tech options like the latest infotainment systems.

Price Comparison:

The Golf is generally priced similarly to the Paceman, but can be slightly more expensive depending on the trim level and options chosen.

Running Costs:

The Golf typically offers better fuel economy and lower insurance costs compared to the Paceman, making it a more economical choice for long-term ownership.

Ford Focus Hatchback

Market Position:

The Focus is known for its engaging driving experience and is often considered a budget-friendly option in the compact segment.

Features Comparison:

While the Focus provides a sportier driving feel, the interior quality may not match the Paceman's premium feel. However, it offers a good range of tech features and a user-friendly infotainment system.

Price Comparison:

The Focus is typically less expensive than the Paceman, especially in base trims, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.

Running Costs:

The Focus generally has competitive fuel economy and lower servicing costs, but insurance rates can vary, sometimes being higher than the Paceman depending on the model.

Peugeot 208 Hatchback

Market Position:

The 208 is positioned as a stylish and affordable supermini, appealing to younger buyers looking for a chic design and urban practicality.

Features Comparison:

The 208 offers a comfortable ride and a stylish interior, but it may lack the driving excitement of the Paceman. It features modern tech but may not have the same level of premium materials.

Price Comparison:

The 208 is generally less expensive than the Paceman, making it a more accessible option for those looking for a small car.

Running Costs:

The 208 excels in fuel economy and is often cheaper to insure, making it a cost-effective choice for city driving and daily commutes.

The MINI Paceman (2013 - 2016) competes well in the compact segment, offering a unique blend of style and driving enjoyment, but faces stiff competition from rivals that often provide better practicality and lower running costs.

    MINI Paceman (2013 - 2016) Alternates & Review