MG ZS SUV (2024 onwards) Review
Expert review with performance specs, running costs, and finance options.
Ford Puma
Market Position:
The Ford Puma is positioned as a sporty and stylish compact SUV, appealing to younger buyers looking for a fun driving experience.
Features Comparison:
The Puma offers a more engaging driving experience with sharper handling compared to the MG ZS. It features advanced tech options like Ford's SYNC infotainment system, which is user-friendly, and a higher quality cabin with better materials.
Price Comparison:
The Puma is generally more expensive than the MG ZS, reflecting its premium features and brand reputation.
Running Costs:
The Puma has competitive fuel economy, often better than the ZS, and is known for its reliability. Insurance and servicing costs are slightly higher, but overall ownership costs remain reasonable.
Nissan Juke
Market Position:
The Nissan Juke is marketed as a quirky and distinctive compact SUV, appealing to those who prioritize style and individuality.
Features Comparison:
The Juke offers a unique design and a more dynamic driving experience than the MG ZS. It comes with a range of tech features, including a customizable infotainment system, but the cabin quality may not be as refined as the ZS.
Price Comparison:
The Juke is typically priced similarly to the MG ZS, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.
Running Costs:
Fuel economy is comparable to the ZS, but the Juke may have slightly higher insurance costs. Reliability is generally good, and servicing costs are in line with the ZS.
Hyundai Kona
Market Position:
The Hyundai Kona is positioned as a versatile and well-rounded compact SUV, appealing to a broad audience with its blend of practicality and style.
Features Comparison:
The Kona offers a more premium feel with a higher quality interior and advanced tech features, including a larger touchscreen and better connectivity options compared to the MG ZS.
Price Comparison:
The Kona is usually more expensive than the MG ZS, reflecting its higher-end features and brand reputation.
Running Costs:
The Kona generally offers better fuel economy and reliability than the ZS, with competitive insurance and servicing costs, making it a cost-effective choice for ownership.
The MG ZS SUV (2024 onwards) competes well in the compact SUV market, offering good value and practicality, but may lack the driving engagement and premium features of some rivals.