MG ZS SUV (2017 - 2024) Review
Expert review with performance specs, running costs, and finance options.
Ford Puma
Market Position:
The Ford Puma is positioned as a sporty and stylish compact SUV, appealing to younger buyers looking for a fun driving experience.
Features Comparison:
The Puma offers a more engaging driving experience with sharper handling compared to the MG ZS. It comes with advanced tech features like Ford's SYNC infotainment system, which is generally considered more intuitive than the MG's system. Cabin quality is also superior in the Puma, with better materials and a more modern design.
Price Comparison:
The Ford Puma is typically more expensive than the MG ZS, reflecting its higher quality and brand reputation.
Running Costs:
The Puma offers competitive fuel economy, often better than the MG ZS, and is known for its reliability. Insurance and servicing costs are generally in line with the ZS, but the Puma may have slightly higher overall ownership costs due to its initial price.
Nissan Juke
Market Position:
The Nissan Juke is known for its distinctive styling and is targeted at buyers looking for a unique and compact crossover experience.
Features Comparison:
The Juke features a sportier design and a more dynamic driving feel compared to the MG ZS. It includes a range of tech features, but some may find the infotainment system less user-friendly than that of the ZS. Cabin quality is decent, but the Juke's quirky design may not appeal to everyone.
Price Comparison:
The Nissan Juke is generally priced similarly to the MG ZS, making them direct competitors in the compact SUV market.
Running Costs:
The Juke offers good fuel economy and is known for its reliability. Insurance and servicing costs are comparable to the MG ZS, making it a cost-effective option for ownership.
Hyundai Kona
Market Position:
The Hyundai Kona is positioned as a versatile and well-equipped compact SUV, appealing to a broad audience with its blend of style and practicality.
Features Comparison:
The Kona provides a more premium feel with higher-quality materials and a more sophisticated infotainment system compared to the MG ZS. It also offers a more engaging driving experience, with better handling and performance.
Price Comparison:
The Hyundai Kona is typically more expensive than the MG ZS, reflecting its higher build quality and brand reputation.
Running Costs:
The Kona generally offers better fuel economy than the MG ZS and is known for its reliability. Insurance and servicing costs are slightly higher, but the overall ownership experience is often seen as more rewarding.
The MG ZS SUV (2017 - 2024) competes well in the budget-friendly segment but often falls short in driving dynamics and interior quality compared to its rivals.